All use cases

Prevent / Care

Hormone lab-result dose-review handoff

Your patient's follow-up panel just posted and three markers shifted, but it will sit unread for a week until someone has time to compare it against last quarter. The agent reads it against protocol, summarizes the values, and books the dose-review before it goes stale.

Get aheadSystem triggerRisk triggerIn-appPushEmailChatGLP-1 & PeptidesHealth & TelehealthSubscription

What it does

In a hormone-optimization program the follow-up panel is the whole point of the visit, and it is also where the loop quietly breaks: the result posts, no one compares it against protocol thresholds or the patient's own trend, and the dose-review that should follow waits behind a queue while the patient wonders whether anything changed. The agent reads each new hormone panel as it lands, compares the markers against the program's protocol ranges and the patient's prior results, flags anything out of range or trending the wrong way, and books or drafts a clinician dose-review with the values pre-summarized. It never states a dose or tells the patient what to change. It assembles the case and hands it to the clinician, who decides.

How it works

  1. 1
    Trigger. a follow-up hormone panel posts from the lab system (markers such as testosterone, estradiol, hematocrit, PSA), or a result crosses a protocol threshold.
  2. 2
    Decision. the agent reads each marker against the program's protocol ranges and the patient's own prior results, identifies what is out of range or trending against target, and assembles a structured summary — flagging, never interpreting to the patient.
  3. 3
    Action. a dose-review is booked or drafted for the clinician with the panel pre-summarized: each marker, its protocol range, the trend since last test, and what changed. The patient gets only a "your results are in and your clinician is reviewing them" note on their preferred channel.
  4. 4
    Follow-through. nothing about a dose reaches the patient until the clinician acts; the review outcome and the panel write back to memory so the next panel is read in context; a markedly out-of-range safety marker is surfaced for priority review rather than a routine slot.
Example
Agent (to the patient)Your latest panel is in and I've sent it to your clinician with your history attached. They'll review it and reach out about next steps — I'll let you know the moment there's an update.
Agent (dose-review draft for the clinician)New panel vs last quarter: testosterone mid-range and steady, estradiol up and now above the protocol range, hematocrit climbing toward the upper limit. Booked for dose-review. Values, ranges, and trend attached for your decision.
ClinicianGot it — reviewing before I adjust anything.

Configuration

How the agent is wired for this use case.

Triggera hormone_panel_posted event from the lab system, or a marker crossing a protocol threshold
Tools & actions
  • Lab system · read the posted panel and its reference ranges
  • Clinical/EHR system · pull the patient's prior results and current protocol to compare trend against target
  • Knowledge base · apply the program's protocol ranges and the per-marker flag criteria
  • Scheduling system · book or draft a clinician dose-review with the panel pre-summarized
  • Messaging channel · tell the patient their results are in and under clinician review, with no values interpreted
  • Memory store · write the panel and the review outcome back so the next panel is read in context
Autonomyreading the panel against ranges, flagging out-of-range markers, and assembling the dose-review summary run unattended under a clinical-safety policy class. The agent never states a dose, never interprets a value to the patient, and never advises a change — it surfaces the case and the clinician decides. Every patient-facing message is judge-gated.
Channelsin-app · push · email · chat
Escalationevery dose decision is the clinician's; a markedly out-of-range or safety-relevant marker is surfaced for priority review rather than a routine slot, and the patient receives no dose guidance from the agent.

What you need

The inputs this use case runs on. Your channels stay yours; the agent supplies the judgment.

Signals

hormone_panel_posted or an equivalent result-processed event from the lab pipeline, prior-result history, protocol-threshold crossings

Data

the posted panel and reference ranges, complete per-patient result history, the program's protocol ranges, current dose, persistent memory, consent state

Guardrails

clinical-safety policy class — the agent flags against ranges and assembles a handoff but never states or interprets a dose to the patient; clinician sign-off on every dose decision; values and trend attached to every review; judge gating on every patient-facing message; full audit trail of every flag and handoff

Metrics it moves

  • time-to-resolutiondown, because the panel arrives pre-summarized against protocol and trend instead of waiting for a from-scratch comparison
  • clinician-hours-savedup, as the dose-review lands assembled rather than the clinician reconstructing each panel against last quarter by hand
  • adherenceup, since the dose-review happens on schedule after each panel instead of stalling, keeping the patient progressing on protocol

Related use cases

Engage / Lifecycle

Test-result interpretation agent

the deliberate opposite: that one reads results to the patient, this one hands a panel to the clinician

Prevent / Care

Titration-readiness clinician handoff

the GLP-1 dose-readiness handoff this mirrors for a hormone panel

Prevent / Care

Hematocrit and blood-pressure safety-flag escalation (TRT)

the safety-rail sibling that halts the refill when a marker crosses a danger threshold

See it on your own customer journey

Bring one drop-off, one churn cliff, or one silent segment. We will show you what a proactive agent with memory and judgment does with it.

Book a demo