Engage / Lifecycle
Test-result interpretation agent
Your customer just got their hormone results and is staring at numbers they don't understand. The agent reads them in the light of everything that came before.
What it does
An at-home test result is the moment of highest attention in the whole product: the customer is curious, often anxious, and ready to engage. Most apps answer that moment with a chart and a reference range, and the engagement dies right there. The agent interprets each new result against the customer's full history: what the numbers mean in plain language, how the trajectory has moved since the last test, and what to pay attention to next. Every result becomes a conversation instead of a dead end, and the interpretation layer becomes the foundation for a product's own AI coach.
How it works
- 1Trigger. a
test_result_readyevent arrives from the result-processing pipeline when a new test is scored. - 2Decision. the agent loads the customer's complete result history and memory (goals, cycle context, prior conversations), compares the new value against the customer's own baseline rather than only the population range, and checks consent and clinical boundaries. Every interpretation passes the quality judge before the customer sees it.
- 3Action. an in-app message opens the result with a plain-language read: what this number means, how it sits against their own history, what the trend suggests. The customer can ask follow-up questions in the same chat thread.
- 4Follow-through. values that cross red-flag thresholds skip self-serve interpretation and route to clinical escalation. The conversation writes back to memory so the next result is read with this one in context. Rollout is staged: offline quality comparison against expert interpretations first, then 5% of result events, then 15%, with retention measured against a holdout group before going wider.
Configuration
How the agent is wired for this use case.
test_result_ready event from the result-processing pipeline when a new test is scored- Result-processing pipeline · read the scored result and its reference ranges
- Customer memory store · load complete result history, goals, cycle context, and prior Q&A
- Messaging channel · open the result in-app and hold the follow-up conversation in the same chat thread
- Clinical escalation path · route red-flag values to the clinical team
- Memory store · write the conversation back so the next result is read in context
What you need
The inputs this use case runs on. Your channels stay yours; the agent supplies the judgment.
Signals
test_result_ready or an equivalent result-processed webhook from the lab or device pipeline
Data
complete per-customer result history, reference ranges, customer memory (goals, cycle data, prior Q&A), consent state
Guardrails
judge gating on every interpretation; educational framing, never diagnosis; red-flag values escalate to humans instead of being interpreted; staged rollout behind an offline quality benchmark; holdout measurement before scale-up
Metrics it moves
- churndown: a result the customer actually understands is a reason to stay subscribed for the next one
- ltvup: retention measured against a control group, modeled into revenue per the staged-rollout design
- dau-mauup: every result event converts into an in-app conversation instead of a glance at a chart
Related use cases
Lab-result-driven product personalization
the commerce sibling of the same result moment
Clinical red-flag detection and safe escalation
where interpretation must stop and humans take over
Proactive health-coach companion
the coach this interpretation layer grows into
See it on your own customer journey
Bring one drop-off, one churn cliff, or one silent segment. We will show you what a proactive agent with memory and judgment does with it.
Book a demo