Onboard / Activate
Conversational therapist-matching intake
Someone who has finally decided to find a therapist shouldn't lose that nerve to a long form — the agent turns matching into a gentle conversation that ends in a booked first session.
What it does
On a therapy marketplace, the moment a person commits to getting help is fragile. A wall of dropdowns about goals, history, and preferences asks the most for exactly the kind of effort the user has least of right now, and "what kind of therapist even fits me?" is a doubt a static form can't answer — so the browser closes the tab instead of booking. The agent runs the intake as a conversation: it elicits goals and preferences gently, answers the fit questions in the moment, and produces a clean structured match brief the matching system can act on. The same information, far less drop-off, and a browser turned into a first session.
How it works
- 1Trigger. a new user lands on the matching intake or starts and stalls in the form — a behavioral signal from the marketplace front end.
- 2Decision. the agent asks for goals, background, and therapist preferences one step at a time, recalls what has already been answered so nothing is asked twice, and when the user hesitates on fit it surfaces a plain-language explanation rather than pushing the next field.
- 3Action. in chat, it walks the user through the intake, resolves the "what kind of therapist fits me?" doubt, and assembles a structured match brief (goals, preferences, constraints) for the matching system.
- 4Follow-through. the brief is written to the matching system to surface candidate therapists and book the first session; an incomplete intake can be reopened where it was left, and clinical or crisis language hands off rather than continuing the match flow.
Configuration
How the agent is wired for this use case.
- Messaging channel · conducts the intake conversationally in chat and answers fit questions in the same thread.
- Knowledge base · retrieves plain-language guidance on therapy types and what fits which goals to resolve the "which therapist?" doubt.
- Memory store · holds answers already given within the intake so questions are never repeated and a stall can be resumed.
- Scheduling system · surfaces matched therapists and their availability and books the first session.
- CRM · writes the structured match brief (goals, preferences, constraints) back for the matching system and the assigned therapist.
What you need
The inputs this use case runs on. Your channels stay yours; the agent supplies the judgment.
Signals
intake-started and intake-stalled events from the marketplace front end.
Data
the intake field set (goals, background, preferences), the therapist-attribute taxonomy the match runs on, in-session answer memory, consent for sensitive mental-health data.
Guardrails
the agent elicits preferences only and makes no clinical diagnosis; sensitive-data consent and handling; a crisis-language detector that halts and routes to a human and helpline; judge review of generated guidance.
Metrics it moves
- intake-completionup, a conversation that answers doubts mid-flow finishes where a long static form is abandoned.
- conversion-rateup, a resolved fit question and a ready match brief turn a browser into a booked first session.
- time-to-valuedown, the user reaches a matched therapist and a booking in one sitting instead of stalling between steps.
- npsup, a gentle, guided first experience sets the tone for the whole therapeutic relationship.
Related use cases
Conversational intake and eligibility check
the clinical-eligibility intake this matching intake is distinct from
Onboarding-quiz to personalized-plan activation
the goal-quiz sibling for self-serve wellness apps
Intake-quiz abandonment recovery
the recovery motion when the intake is abandoned outright
See it on your own customer journey
Bring one drop-off, one churn cliff, or one silent segment. We will show you what a proactive agent with memory and judgment does with it.
Book a demo